Hi, I’m Dr. Karyn! Read my introduction to learn more about me and meet my five hilarious cats: Clutch, Cyril, Alex, Zelda, and Zazzles.
You might assume that as a vet, I have a pretty rigid stance on vaccination, but just like you, I want to make sure that the choices I make are based on facts and science, and are right for my cats, and my situation.
In veterinary practice, our recommendations need to be in keeping with the manufacturer guidelines; it simply isn’t practical to have a multitude of different options for a multitude of different scenarios. With that in mind, there are three messages I would like all cat owners to take home:
I often get asked “Is vaccination safe?” and the honest answer is that introducing a foreign agent into the body to elicit an immune response is not 100% safe, but it is much safer than leaving your pet exposed to the risks of contracting deadly viruses. So you might want to know:
Do I vaccinate my cats? Yes.
Do I strictly adhere to the manufacturer guidelines? Not completely.
Am I aware that I am taking a risk by deviating from those guidelines? Yes, but I base my decision on the risk factors for my specific situation.
If you’d like to know what influences my decisions about vaccinating my cats, we’ll need to get some of the nitty gritty stuff out of the way. Trust me, you’ll come away feeling a lot more confident about making the right choices for your cats with a bit more knowledge under your belt.
The practice of exposing humans, and later, animals, to a small dose of an infectious agent to trigger an immune response dates back to at least the mid 15th century, possibly even earlier than that. When Smallpox was busy wiping out hundreds of millions of people around the world, a process called variolation emerged, where a small amount of the fluid from a smallpox lesion was injected into a healthy human. This was a risky procedure as the chances of developing a fulminant case of smallpox were extremely high, but it did start to prove that a small dose of the virus could create enough of an immune response to render the patient immune.
But it wasn’t until a man named Dr Edward Jenner (honestly, you can’t go anywhere without hearing about a Jenner these days!) discovered that the same immune response could be achieved by using cowpox – a related but much safer poxvirus.
When a virus enters the body, it triggers the immune system to release pathogen-fighting cells like neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes (T cells and B cells). After a while, the body starts producing lymphocytes that are more specifically adapted to fighting the viral particles, resulting in a faster, stronger attack.
If the virus is successfully killed, the bone marrow keeps producing cells that can target that particular virus, called memory B and T cells. These memory cells may last for months, a few years, or a lifetime, depending on the virus and the individual.
The problem with relying on our natural immune response to a virus is that it’s a game of chance. We only develop a natural immunity if we survive, and we may end up with long term or permanent health consequences from the infection.
This is where vaccination comes in.
A vaccine uses an inactive version of the virus to ‘trick’ the immune system into producing an immune reaction and creating memory cells, without causing the actual infection. This often results in the patient feeling unwell or showing some mild symptoms of the virus, but this is simply a sign of the immune system responding.
Here’s where it gets a bit more technical.
In order to trigger a good enough response to the inactivated virus, most vaccines contain something called an adjuvant. This adjuvant is what really fires up the immune system, making sure it gets to the stage of making memory cells, and it is the body’s response to this adjuvant that usually creates the majority of side effects. But, the more powerfully the body responds, the more likely it is to create a good supply of memory cells, so that the next time the body encounters the virus, it can fight it off quickly and efficiently.
Just like with humans, cats often suffer from various side effects of vaccination, including lethargy, fever, or swelling. It might be unpleasant for a day or two, but it is an expected reaction. True adverse vaccine reactions, where the injection triggers an extreme allergic or systemic reaction, are very rare.
The worst potential side effect to vaccination in cats is something called an injection site sarcoma – a type of malignant tumor that can form where a vaccination has been given. This nasty tumor requires aggressive treatment, including surgical removal of the mass.
Feline vaccines are traditionally given in the scruff, because there is lots of loose skin, so it is much easier to inject, as well as more comfortable and less stressful for the cat. But if an injection site sarcoma grows in this location, it is difficult, if not impossible, to completely remove the tumor as it often extends to the spine.
To combat this, it has been recommended that cats be vaccinated over a limb, as this would allow amputation if needed to completely remove the cancer. But, the lower down the limb we go, the less loose skin there is, and the more painful and stressful the injection becomes, so it can be a bit of a case of weighing up the risks and benefits, as well as finding other ways to reduce the chance of this effect.
Studies have found that the Feline Leukemia Virus Vaccine appears to have a higher risk of inducing a sarcoma, possibly due to the fact that the virus itself attacks the bone marrow and immune system.
One method to reduce risk is giving leukemia vaccines every 3 years, rather than annually.
One company has created a non-adjuvanted vaccine, in the hopes that this will result in less intense side effects, but this vaccine does not give a long-lasting protection as ones that contain an adjuvant, so it is supposed to be given annually.
This is where your decision-making comes into play. You need to be aware, and honest, about the sort of risks your cats face, and talk to your vet about how to make sure they stay protected.
Cats in breeding colonies, shelter conditions, or that live outdoors with a higher risk of interacting with other cats, should be vaccinated against leukemia virus according to the manufacturer recommendation.
For cats living indoors, once they have received a complete primary vaccination course, and I generally recommend that they have their kitten course, plus one a year after, you may want to think about whether or not they need to continue with this particular vaccination. While viruses like cat flu can be transmitted through the air and on surfaces, the leukemia virus requires direct cat-to-cat contact.
If you do decide to go down the route of not vaccinating against leukemia virus, it is vital that you ensure any new cats entering your home have had either a complete vaccination course, or have been tested for the virus before coming into contact with your cat.
My cats are 100% indoor, and are no longer vaccinated against leukemia virus – they have zero risk of exposure. I do, however, vaccinate them against the cat flu viruses every three years.
You might be wondering, Why risk using the leukemia vaccine at all?
When a cat becomes infected with feline leukemia, there is a window of time where, if the virus is successfully eliminated, the cat will survive and have gained natural immunity – Yay!
BUT, we don’t know exactly how long that immunity lasts, AND if the virus is not eliminated within that window of time, the cat will develop feline leukemia, a debilitating disease that often leads to suffering and death.
Of course they’re not completely safe – we are manipulating the immune system with an artificially altered version of a virus. Does that sound safe to you? But it’s a hell of a lot safer than taking our chances of surviving the actual virus.
The fact is, if we are putting something into the body to elicit a reaction, side effects are inevitable. If a drug or vaccine claims to have zero side effects, it probably doesn’t have any therapeutic effects either.
I hate that we live in a world where big pharmaceutical companies profit from disease, and I think that we’re right to do our own research and ask questions.
BUT, the fact that big pharma makes money from vaccination, does not mean that vaccination is bad.
Is it really crappy that there are people that stand to make billions from every viral outbreak? Absolutely! But that shouldn’t mean that we stop protecting our pets.
Natural immunity might work, but it only works if your cat survives.
© 2023 to 2024 Puppy-tronics.com. All rights reserved.